next up previous
Next: Acknowledgments Up: NEM Interpolant Previous: NEM Interpolant

Quadratic Precision

Farin [1] has outlined many properties of the $ C^1(\Omega)$ interpolant given in Eq. (8). Here we discuss some of the important properties that are germane to a displacement-based Galerkin formulation that is pursued in this paper.

The $ C^1(\Omega)$ interpolant has quadratic precison [1], i.e. it can exactly reproduce a quadratic displacement field. As opposed to the above, the $ C^1(\Omega)$ interpolant proposed by [15] can only reproduce spherical quadratics, i.e. functions of the form $ \alpha(x^2 - y^2)$. By virtue of the quadratic precision property, the $ C^1(\Omega)$ NEM interpolant can exactly represent a state of constant curvature (second-derivatives of displacement) which is required in order to pass the patch test for a fourth-order PDE such as the biharmonic equation.

By judicious choice of the Bézier ordinates, [16] realized a quadratic precision interpolant. For a cubic $ n$-gon simplex, there are $ n^2 + \binom{n}{3}$ control points, and consequently the same number of Bézier ordinates. Of these, $ n^2$ control points lie along the line joining vertices $ \mathbf{q}_{  {\mathbf{i}}}$ and $ \mathbf{q}_{ {\mathbf{j}}}$. The associated ``boundary'' Bézier ordinates to these $ n^2$ control points have either one 3 and all other zeros (e.g. $ b_{0,3,0,0}$ for $ n=4$) or one 2, one 1, and other zeros (e.g. $ b_{1,2,0,0}$ for $ n=4$). The former (vertex or corner ordinates) are equal to the nodal function value, while the latter Bézier ordinates are easily found in the tangent planes. The additional $ \binom{n}{3}$ ``free'' parameters are those which have three 1's and all other zeros (e.g. $ b_{1,1,1,0}$ for $ n=4$). An optimal choice for the center Bézier ordinate is given by $ b_{1,1,1,0} = \frac{3}{2}a - \frac{1}{2}c$ [16], where $ a$ is the centroid of the tangent Bézier ordinates while $ c$ is the centroid of the vertex (corner) Bézier ordinates. The above choice of the center Bézier ordinate guarantees quadratic precision. An illustration of the calculation of the Bézier ordinates for a cubic triangular patch is shown in Fig. 2.1. Referring to Fig. 2.1, we can express $ b_{1,1,1}$ as

$\displaystyle b_{1,1,1,0} = \frac{3}{2}a - \frac{1}{2}c ,$ (9)

where

$\displaystyle a = \frac{b_{2,1,0} + b_{1,2,0} + b_{2,0,1} + b_{1,0,2} + b_{0,2,1} + b_{0,1,2}}{6} , \quad c = \frac{b_{3,0,0} + b_{0,3,0} + b_{0,0,3}}{3}.$ (10)

\begin{figure}\centering\epsfig{file=BB-triangle_bi.eps,width=0.7\textwidth}\par...
... Evaluation of B\'{e}zier ordinates for a cubic triangular
patch}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}\centering\epsfig{file=pentagon_bi.eps,width=0.8\textwidth}\par\te...
...{e}zier ordinates used in the algorithm for a
pentagonal simplex}
\end{figure}


next up previous
Next: Acknowledgments Up: NEM Interpolant Previous: NEM Interpolant
N. Sukumar